−13.9%

The real cost of a 1% fee, worked out over thirty years

One percent sounds small next to a 6% return. Run it over a working lifetime and it takes roughly a quarter of your growth. Here is the arithmetic.

On this page 5 sections

A 1% annual fee is usually presented as one number among many on a fact sheet. It reads like a rounding error. It is not, because a fee is charged on the whole balance every year, including all the growth from previous years. That makes it compound against you just as returns compound for you.

The examples below use a 6% gross annual return. That is an illustrative figure, not a forecast. The pattern holds at any return.

A single deposit, left alone

Suppose you invest $10,000 once and never touch it. Compare a product charging 0.2% a year with one charging 1.2%, and a hypothetical zero-fee version for reference.

Years No fee (6.0%) 0.2% fee (5.8%) 1.2% fee (4.8%)
10 $17,908 $17,573 $15,981
20 $32,071 $30,883 $25,540
30 $57,435 $54,271 $40,817

After thirty years the 1.2% product leaves you about $13,500 behind the 0.2% product. You put in $10,000. The extra fee cost more than your original deposit.

Regular saving makes the gap bigger

Most people do not invest once. They add a bit each month. Here is $500 a month for thirty years, at 6% gross and at 5% after a 1% fee.

  • Total paid in: $180,000
  • Value at 6%: roughly $502,000
  • Value at 5%: roughly $416,000
  • Difference: about $86,000

Your growth at 6% would have been about $322,000. The 1% fee took roughly $86,000 of it, which is around 27% of everything your money earned. A fee that looks like one-sixth of the return ends up taking more than a quarter of the outcome, because the money it removes in year two would itself have compounded for twenty-eight more years.

Where fees hide

The headline management fee is rarely the only cost. When you review an account, look for each of these and add them up.

  1. Fund running costs. Often shown as an ongoing charge or expense ratio.
  2. Platform or account fee. Charged by whoever holds the investments, sometimes as a percentage, sometimes flat.
  3. Advice fee. If someone manages or advises on the account, this may be a further percentage.
  4. Trading costs. Commissions or spreads each time you buy or sell.
  5. Currency conversion. A small percentage applied whenever you buy something priced in another currency.

A 0.4% fund inside a 0.35% platform with 0.5% advice is a 1.25% product, even though no single line says so.

Is a higher fee ever worth it?

Sometimes. If the extra cost buys something you would otherwise not do, such as staying invested through a bad year instead of selling in a panic, it can pay for itself. Good advice on a complicated situation can also be worth more than it costs. The question is not “is this fee low?” but “what am I getting for each extra 0.1%, and could I get it more cheaply?”

A once-a-year fee check

Set a date, perhaps the week your annual statements arrive, and do this:

  • Find every account that holds long-term savings.
  • Write down every cost as an annual percentage of the balance.
  • Add them up per account.
  • Multiply by the balance to see the yearly cost in money, not percent.

Seeing “$1,140 a year” lands differently from “1.14%”. That number is the one worth arguing with.

Filed under
Portrait of Hannah Vos (illustration)

Written by

Hannah Vos

Investing costs and compounding · Rotterdam

Hannah trained as an actuary and still enjoys a good amortisation table. She writes about fees, compounding and the slow, unglamorous maths of long-term saving.

Live demo · Ballast Notes— View template →